learn and study
понедельник, 2 ноября 2026 г.
понедельник, 12 октября 2026 г.
Nuclear war and malicious use of AI threaten end of humanity by 2100, says Lancet assessment
Nuclear war and malicious use of AI threaten end of humanity by 2100, says Lancet assessment
The Guardian
Kat Lay
Sun 11 Oct 2026 00.01 BST
Newly established
commission identifies 17 catastrophic
threats to human health but says ‘realistic route to act’ on each exists
Humans could become extinct
by the year 2100 due to malicious use of
AI or nuclear conflict, according to a new global risk assessment.
They top a list of 17 major threats to human health over the next 75
years, which also includes cuts to aid spending by wealthy countries, the
climate crisis and childhood malnutrition.
The experts behind The Lancet Commission on 21st Century
Global Threats to Health said all the
threats interact, meaning they must be addressed together – but stressed that
there was “a realistic route to act” on each.
“Decisions made by leaders today will shape the health and wellbeing of the next generation,” said Prof
Christopher Murray, commission co-chair and the director of the Institute for
Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington.
To create its list, the commission modelled how many years in good
health might be lost due to sickness, disability or early deaths due to each
threat, based on current trajectories – a measure known as disability-adjusted life years (Dalys).
“Malicious use of AI, including bioweapons,
and nuclear conflict with nuclear famine
carry risks of extinction in the next 75 years,” the report said, adding that
while their likelihood remained low, they had the potential to end humanity in
the case of nuclear conflict by injecting enough particles into the upper
atmosphere to block sunlight and cause famine, or via AI-created biological
weapons. An accompanying Lancet editorial, published alongside the report,
warned: “The scale of harm, should they be realised, would inflict an apocalypse on humanity.”
Other risks that could cause more than 1bn cumulative Dalys, and
therefore deemed “major catastrophic threats”, included air pollution, antimicrobial resistance, childhood malnutrition and climate
breakdown, as well as conventional
conflict, declining
overseas aid, high alcohol use, high blood pressure, income inequality, low
educational attainment, naturally occurring pandemics, obesity, poor mental
health, smoking and unhealthy ageing.
To be included on the list, threats not only had to potentially cause a
high number of lost healthy years, but also to have potential solutions.
Ibrahim Abubakar, commission member and professor of infectious disease
epidemiology at UCL, said: “We are not starting from a point of view of ‘oh
look, we want to scare you – we’ve got X many threats facing humanity’. We’re
starting from the premise that if you are a policymaker today, whether at the
global multilateral level or at the national level, these are the potential
threats that you could face, and this is the magnitude by which, if you act,
you can actually make a difference.”
Action to limit global heating to about 1.8C (3.2F) rather than letting it reach 4.4C could prevent 1.89bn years of
healthy life being lost, according to the report, which modelled best and worst
case scenarios for each threat.
In higher income regions, non-communicable diseases such as obesity and
poor mental health were the dominant threats, while in lower income regions
health loss was driven by issues such as low educational attainment.
Many major donor nations, including the US and UK, have announced large cuts to
aid spending over the past year. The potential collapse of, or steep reduction in, international health aid could cause up to
1.5bn Dalys before 2100, the commission found, nearly 70% of which would be in
sub-Saharan Africa. The region also bears the brunt of child malnutrition.
The commission was made up of 35 experts, and its findings will be shared on Sunday at the World Health Summit in
Berlin, Germany. Their assessment will be updated annually to re-evaluate the
17 threats identified, incorporating new data and any emerging hazards.
The authors urged leaders to address the risks before they escalated into crises, including via
investment in technological innovations and by strengthening health systems.
“We started this process three years ago, thinking that there were three
big threats: conflict, climate, and pandemics,” said Murray. “There’s a much
larger number of threats that we need to worry about, and governments really
need to dedicate some money and staff to the task of anticipation, prevention
and preparation for this more diverse set of threats.”
Task 1.
Read the headline to consider the topic of the article. Consider the key word.
Task 2.
Read the article, write out words and phrases in bold. Look up the meaning.
Explain the meaning in English and give Russian equivalents.
Task 3.
Read the article again and consider logical division.
Task 4.
Give a summary of the article.
Task 5.
Think of the author’s idea in presenting this article. Render the article.
вторник, 22 сентября 2026 г.
Andy Burnham does not rule out Brexit reversal being in next Labour manifesto
Andy Burnham does not rule out Brexit reversal being in next Labour manifesto
PM says immediate focus is on rebuilding bridges with EU as he prepares for first meeting with Ursula von der Leyen
Pippa Crerar Political editor
Tue 22 Sep 2026 09.00 BST
The prime minister, who will hold his first meeting with the European Commission president, Ursula
von der Leyen, on Tuesday, did not rule out including reversing Brexit in
Labour’s next manifesto – but suggested the country should focus on securing
closer trading ties first.
Ministers have expressed fears
privately that the EU reset has lost
significant momentum since Burnham became prime minister, and a summit on the issue is likely to be
delayed again unless the bloc agrees to
discuss legislation that could lock British business out of parts of EU
industry.
Burnham has said he will stick to Keir Starmer’s red lines this side of
an election, but he is under pressure from Labour MPs who opposed Brexit to change tack, in part because of the potential
boost to growth, even though his own seat of Makerfield voted to leave.
Asked by reporters on his flight to New York on Monday for the UN general assembly whether he could
rule out a reversal of Brexit being in the next Labour manifesto, he said: “Our
focus at the moment is on a UK/EU summit which we hope will take place later
this year.
“My immediate priority is to build on the good work that Keir did in
rebuilding bridges. Because those bridges were broken in the early part of this
decade. And Keir did a good job in re-establishing that relationship.
“What we have got to do now is go to the next level in terms of reaching practical agreement that will
further boost the British economy. And those issues are the substance of the
summit alongside EU requests around youth mobility.”
The prime minister admitted he had concerns about the bloc’s “made in
Europe” legislation, which is designed to
curb China’s increasing presence but could also affect British industry and
supply chains.
He said he would share those concerns “in a constructive spirit” with
von der Leyen. “The other issues you discuss, they are for another day,” he
said of rejoining the bloc.
Burnham said the UK had considerable support among EU member states for
its position on the “made in Europe” legislation, which threatens to scupper ongoing negotiations about
the reset.
“Europe’s argument is not with us. We both suffer the same effects as
other countries, particularly steel,” he said.
“We are making the argument we are not your enemies here ... we are not
the problem. ‘Made in Europe’ is dealing with a different problem.”
He also said delicate UK/Ireland supply chains could end up being
“collateral damage” of any disagreement with the EU.
“Let’s work towards a trusted partner approach that doesn’t cause a
problem where there wasn’t a problem and where we have common cause,” he said.
In his speech to the UN on Tuesday night,
Burnham will reflect on the 10 years since Brexit and say the UK needs to be
more clear-eyed about the risks to its democratic system.
“I’m reflecting on that last decade,” he told reporters on his plane.
“What we’ve experienced is when that turbulence comes, when outside actors seek
to manipulate, to distort facts, influence the British democratic process.
“Going into the next decade we need to
be clear-eyed about that and become stronger and more on the front foot
about challenging that.
“Perhaps Britain can say we have experienced some of the turbulence
before others in terms of the
politics of recent times. We need to be clearer where outside forces, our
enemies, are trying to manipulate that opinion and feeling to serve their
interests, not ours.”
Task 1. Read the headline
to consider the topic of the article.
Task 2. Read the article,
write out words and phrases in bold.
Look up the meaning. Explain the meaning in English and give Russian
equivalents.
Task 3. Read the article
again and consider logical division.
Task 4. Give a summary of
the article.
Task 5. Render the article.
вторник, 8 сентября 2026 г.
Trump renames places and poses as superhero in bizarre social media blitz
Trump
renames places and poses as superhero in bizarre social media blitz
Trump passed the long weekend posting a torrent of memes and musings on his Truth Social platform
The long weekend may have proved too long for Donald Trump, who passed the time by musing about annexing other countries, unilaterally renaming places he’s not allowed to rename and turning himself into a superhero.
Amid the torrent of memes and posts by the president on his Truth Social platform over the Labor Day holiday weekend was a bizarre AI-generated video depicting Trump as the Green Lantern DC superhero, wielding a glowing green power ring to erect his border wall, illuminate an “American manufacturing” scene, and command a fleet of warplanes and warships behind him.
Trump’s controversial forays into AI-generated images have seen him depict himself as a Christ-like figure, the pope, Atlas from Greek mythology, as Superman, and many others.
Over the weekend he also shared a map with a US flag emblazoned over most of North America and several countries in Central America, as well as Greenland, Iceland and many islands in the Caribbean. Iceland has summoned its US ambassador over the post. Trump also separately claimed the moon.
The president has spent much of his second term taunting Canada repeatedly with the suggestion of making it a 51st US state with “economic force”, and aggressively pushing for the annexation of Greenland, a self-governing Danish territory, which has sparked a major geopolitical row. He has also threatened military action in Mexico, Cuba and Colombia, threatened to seize the Panama Canal, and casually mused about taking over other countries including Micronesia and the Marshall Islands.
Also in the flurry of Labor Day posts was a map of the US state of New Mexico with the word “Mexico” crossed out and replaced with “America”. A few hours later, he posted what seems to be an AI video of him sticking an “America” label over the word “Mexico” on a “Welcome to New Mexico” road sign.
Trump’s suggestion that New Mexico should be renamed to “New America” comes as tense trade negotiations with Mexico ramp up. It also comes hot on the heels of Trump signing an order directing the federal government to change Lake Ontario’s name to “Lake America” amid his escalating trade war with Canada after negotiations last month failed to produce a deal.
He has also joked about renaming either the Atlantic or Pacific oceans, along with the strait of Hormuz, which has been central to his disastrous war against Iran, to “Trump strait”. He declined to elaborate on that latter idea when asked by a reporter in the Oval Office last week.
In the case of New Mexico, whose name predates the founding of the United States and is explicitly enshrined in its constitution, Trump has no legal authority to rename it – or indeed any US state. Any change to its name would have to come from the state itself and would require a formal constitutional amendment.
While his “Lake America” order directs
federal agencies to adopt the name-change on US maps, documents and
databases, Trump has no authority to rename Canada’s portion of the lake, nor
to compel Canada, international legal bodies, international mapmakers or the
rest of the world to adopt a new name.
Task 1. Read the headline
to consider the topic of the article.
Task 2. Read the article,
write out words and phrases in bold. Look up the meaning.
Task 3. Read the article
again and consider logical division.
Task 4. Give a summary of
the article.
Task 5. Render the article.