четверг, 6 марта 2025 г.

Mr Know-All by Williams Somerset Maugham


Go through the link below to watch a film "Mr Know-All".

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfO-6RP7mko


Indian cinema chain sued by film-goer over lengthy pre-film ads

Indian cinema chain sued by film-goer over lengthy pre-film ads

Court orders compensation to be paid to 30-year-old from Bangalore, saying ‘in the new era, time is considered as money, each one’s time is very precious’

Hannah Ellis-Petersen in Delhi

Wed 26 Feb 2025 05.13 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/26/india-pvr-inox-cinema-chain-fine-preview-ads

 For some, the adverts that precede the start of a film are the bane of a trip to the cinema; for others, they are a useful buffer as you stand in the popcorn queue. But for one man in India, the lengthy marathon of cinema advertising was so infuriating that he took the matter to the courts – and won.

Abhishek MR, a 30-year-old man from the southern city of Bangalore, had booked a trip to the cinema with friends in December last year to watch wartime drama Sam Bahadur.

But while the scheduled time he had booked the ticket for was 4.05pm, he had to sit through 25 minutes of adverts for upcoming features and commercial items such as homewares, mobile phones and cars before the film actually began.

Having planned to return to work straight after the film, Abhishek MR was angered by what he felt was a costly disruption to his life. He filed a lawsuit against PVR Inox, India’s largest cinema multiplex chain, stating that: “The complainant could not attend other arrangements and appointments which were scheduled for the day and has faced losses that cannot be calculated in terms of money as compensation.”

The lawsuit also accused multiplex cinemas of prioritising advertising revenue over their customers, and forcing them to sit through adverts against their will.

In a ruling in February, the consumer court proved highly sympathetic to Abhishek MR’s case and ordered for the cinema to grant him 50,000 INR (£450) for wasting his time and 5,000 INR (£45) for mental agony, as well as cover his legal expenses.

“In the new era, time is considered as money, each one’s time is very precious,” the court ruling stated. “Twenty-five to 30 minutes is a considerable amount of time to sit idle in the theatre and watch unnecessary ads. People with tight schedules do not have time to waste.”

The cinema had defended itself, arguing it was legally required to show public service announcements. However, it was found that most of the adverts shown before the film had been commercial.

Cinema is seen as a highly effective medium for advertising in India, and its share of the advertising sector is on the rise. Unlike western cinemas, in India, adverts are shown both before the film and during a 15-minute ad break in the middle of the feature.


Task 1. Comment on the title of the article.

Task 2. Read and translate the article paying attention to the words and phrases in bold.

Task 3. Find the English equivalents of the following words and phrases:

1) быть юридически обязательным

2) рекламная пауза

3) идти в гору/повышаться, улучшаться

4) суд по защите прав потребителей

5) покрывать юридические расходы

6) судебный процесс по обвинению

7) подать иск против

8) терпеть убытки

9) годовой доход

Task 4. Make up some sentences of your own with the words and phrases in bold.

Task 5. Act out a dialogue using the new vocabulary.

Task 6. Read the article a second time and be ready to discuss in the classroom:

-           what was the author’s intention to tell the general public about

-           what is the main idea/ problem raised

-           speak on the logical devision

 

Answer the following questions:

1. What was the main reason Abhishek MR decided to file a lawsuit against PVR Inox?

2. How long did Abhishek MR have to sit through adverts before the film started?

3. What compensation did the consumer court award Abhishek MR for his time and mental agony?

4. What argument did the cinema chain use to defend their practice of showing adverts?

5. How does the advertising practice in Indian cinemas differ from that in Western cinemas?

 

Task 7. Write a rendering of the article. Mind the rules of a rendering writing. (second lesson)




четверг, 13 февраля 2025 г.

London’s first Roman basilica found under office block

London’s first Roman basilica found under office block

Archaeologists hail discovery of near-2,000-year-old remains as among most significant recent finds in the city

Esther Addley

Thu 13 Feb 2025 14.22 GMT

The remains of London’s earliest Roman basilica have been discovered under an office block, in what archaeologists have described as one of the most significant recent discoveries in the capital.

The almost 2,000-year-old structure was part of the forum, the Roman capital’s social and administrative centre, and built around the late 70s or early 80s CE, just a few decades after the Romans invaded Britain and 20 years after Boudicca sacked and burned the city in 60CE.

Situated on a high point in the city on a raised platform, the forum was a large open space about the size of a football pitch, lined with shops and other buildings. The basilica, at its heart, functioned as a kind of town hall, in which important political and judicial decisions were made.

Intriguingly, archaeologists believe the excavated section contains the tribunal, a designated part of the basilica where important officials would have sat on a raised stage to adjudicate on the main issues affecting the capital of the new Roman outpost.

The structure was short-lived, however, being replaced in about AD100 by a much bigger forum built on the same site.

Describing the find as “one of the most significant discoveries made in the city in recent years”, Sophie Jackson, the director of development at Mola, the Museum of London Archaeology, said: “It’s like discovering the speaker’s chair and chamber of the House of Commons, 2,000 years into the future. The levels of preservation of the basilica have far exceeded our expectations, and we have possibly the most important part of the building.

“Excitingly, we’ve only just scratched the surface of this site’s potential through our initial investigations.”

The remains were discovered in 2023 as part of the redevelopment of an office building at 85 Gracechurch Street, next to the entrance to the historic Leadenhall market at the heart of the City of London.

Task 1. Comment on the title of the article.

Task 2. Read and translate the article paying attention to the words and phrases in bold.

Task 3. Find the English equivalents of the following words and phrases.

1)  разграбить и сжечь город

2) вторгаться в

3) зал для заседаний

4) археолог

5) находка

6) перепланировка

7) выносить решения по основным вопросам

8) руины

9) принимать политические и судебные решения

10) Римская базилика

11) раскопанный участок

Task 4. Make up some sentences of your own with the words and phrases in bold.

Task 5. Act out a dialogue using the new vocabulary.

Task 6. Read the article a second time and be ready to discuss in the classroom:

-         what was the author’s intention to tell the general public about

-         what is the main idea/ problem raised

-         speak on the logical devision

Task 7. Write a rendering of the article. Mind the rules of a rendering writing. (second lesson)